cfull1 wrote:As far as versioning goes should we just move to numbers (0.4.1.6) or dates (0.4.1.20130516)?
cfull1 wrote:Does anyone have a problem with the approach of creating an organization rather than a regular account to hold the repo in?
blackwind wrote:If we're going to switch, I say we move to the standard GNU versioning system and drop the fourth number entirely -- next release is 0.4.2, the one after that is 0.4.3, the next major release is 0.5.0, and so forth. There's no need for anything more complex than that, nor was there ever.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 5 guests