Controlling QLC+

krambriw · Post by **krambriw** » Sun Jun 19, 2016 4:23 am

@krambriw, thanks for chiming in. i didn't know that websockets uses a fixed port. and why is that?

Is just cause it is implemented that way, there is no obvious reason except that 1234 is rather common. I think it would not be hard to add but decision is up to the author Pako, there might be a reason behind his decision to not make it configurable.

kgschlosser · Post by **kgschlosser** » Sun Jun 19, 2016 4:28 am

oh ok. i didn't know if there was some kind of standard.

Jabberwock · Post by **Jabberwock** » Sun Jun 19, 2016 8:16 am

It already is configurable, as I wrote above. I have used it with a 9999 port server.

kgschlosser · Post by **kgschlosser** » Sun Jun 19, 2016 5:15 pm

ok. so are you good. or do you want me to do something with that osc protocol??

Jabberwock · Post by **Jabberwock** » Sun Jun 19, 2016 5:26 pm

Yes, I am good. OSC and/or ArtNet plugins might be useful in the future for someone, but I am quite satisfied with the web interface.

kgschlosser · Post by **kgschlosser** » Tue Jun 21, 2016 3:53 am

good deal

EventGhost

Controlling QLC+

Re: Controlling QLC+

Re: Controlling QLC+

Re: Controlling QLC+

Re: Controlling QLC+

Re: Controlling QLC+

Re: Controlling QLC+