Notice: This forum has been recovered from an old backup, so some content, links, and dates may be outdated. The forum is currently read-only while we restore sign-in and registration functionality. Details
If you find this forum valuable and would like to help keep it online, donations to help cover hosting and domain costs are greatly appreciated, but never expected. You can support the forum through Buy Me a Coffee or Ko-fi. Thank you for helping preserve the EventGhost community.
If you find this forum valuable and would like to help keep it online, donations to help cover hosting and domain costs are greatly appreciated, but never expected. You can support the forum through Buy Me a Coffee or Ko-fi. Thank you for helping preserve the EventGhost community.
Rebuild "Jump if double event" from 0.4.0.r1397
Rebuild "Jump if double event" from 0.4.0.r1397
I'm using an old experimental version of EG 0.4.0.r1397 which seems not to be developed any further.
I've used the very nice function of "Jump if double event" very often, because it nearly doubles my remote-keys and works much more flawless than the long-keypress function.
Is it possible to rebuild (myself) this "double-click" event in an actual 0.3.x version of EG with some tricks?
I've used the very nice function of "Jump if double event" very often, because it nearly doubles my remote-keys and works much more flawless than the long-keypress function.
Is it possible to rebuild (myself) this "double-click" event in an actual 0.3.x version of EG with some tricks?
- Pako
- Plugin Developer
- Posts: 2294
- Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 1:31 pm
- Location: Czech Republic
- Contact:
Re: Rebuild "Jump if double event" from 0.4.0.r1397
I do not use an experimental version 0.4.0 and I did not know that the action "Jump if double event" exists.
I tried to use some parts of the experimental version in the current version 0.3.7.
Unfortunately, it looks like it can not be done easily. The difference is too much.
I can not promise anything, but I'll try at least the mentioned action "Jump if double event"
to implement in the currently maintained version 0.3.7.
Pako
I tried to use some parts of the experimental version in the current version 0.3.7.
Unfortunately, it looks like it can not be done easily. The difference is too much.
I can not promise anything, but I'll try at least the mentioned action "Jump if double event"
to implement in the currently maintained version 0.3.7.
Pako
Re: Rebuild "Jump if double event" from 0.4.0.r1397
Thanks Pako, that would be great! 
I'm sorry if this is a dumb question, but how do I recognize your implementation (when it's done)? I can't find any history to the newest versions of EG...
I'm sorry if this is a dumb question, but how do I recognize your implementation (when it's done)? I can't find any history to the newest versions of EG...
- Pako
- Plugin Developer
- Posts: 2294
- Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 1:31 pm
- Location: Czech Republic
- Contact:
Re: Rebuild "Jump if double event" from 0.4.0.r1397
I'm not sure I understand your question correctly. I hope so.
The only place where you can watch the progress of work on the EventGhost is SourceForge SVN Repository.
For example, here is the link to Web-based Version Control Repository Browsing.
Pako
The only place where you can watch the progress of work on the EventGhost is SourceForge SVN Repository.
For example, here is the link to Web-based Version Control Repository Browsing.
Pako
Re: Rebuild "Jump if double event" from 0.4.0.r1397
Now I'm not sure, if I can handle that SVN repository - too much information
I don't know anything about trunks or bitmonsters...
I just want to know, if you're done with the implementation, THAT you are done and I can test it...
I see the 0.3.7.x version of EG growing, but I can't find a history, what's new in it - so I wonder, if I can find your implementation of the double-event-command. Or can you inform me in this thread?
I just want to know, if you're done with the implementation, THAT you are done and I can test it...
I see the 0.3.7.x version of EG growing, but I can't find a history, what's new in it - so I wonder, if I can find your implementation of the double-event-command. Or can you inform me in this thread?
- Pako
- Plugin Developer
- Posts: 2294
- Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 1:31 pm
- Location: Czech Republic
- Contact:
Re: Rebuild "Jump if double event" from 0.4.0.r1397
I wrote I can not promise anything ..., so there is nothing certain.
But if I succeed, so in that case I will certainly inform about it, also in this topic.
Pako
But if I succeed, so in that case I will certainly inform about it, also in this topic.
Pako
Re: Rebuild "Jump if double event" from 0.4.0.r1397
I noticed, that you didn't promise anything 
It was just "in case"...
Thanks again for trying!
It was just "in case"...
Thanks again for trying!
Re: Rebuild "Jump if double event" from 0.4.0.r1397
Just a question: what is planned in the future with 0.4.0? Willl it be developed further or is it completely dropped?
Re: Rebuild "Jump if double event" from 0.4.0.r1397
ZappoB wrote:I'm using an old experimental version of EG 0.4.0.r1397 which seems not to be developed any further.
I've used the very nice function of "Jump if double event" very often, because it nearly doubles my remote-keys and works much more flawless than the long-keypress function.
Is it possible to rebuild (myself) this "double-click" event in an actual 0.3.x version of EG with some tricks?
I have never gotten long presses to work for me with my X10-Firefly...
Could you post a/the file/s of this?
It sounds interesting.
eventghost.net
Be there or be square.
Be there or be square.
Re: Rebuild "Jump if double event" from 0.4.0.r1397
What files do you mean? The experimental EG version could be found here: http://www.eventghost.net/downloads/
The "double click" is named "Jump if double event" - so you can test on your own. But be careful, as mentioned in the entry-post, this versions of EG seems not to be developed any further!
The "double click" is named "Jump if double event" - so you can test on your own. But be careful, as mentioned in the entry-post, this versions of EG seems not to be developed any further!
Re: Rebuild "Jump if double event" from 0.4.0.r1397
Thank you very much i appreciated your hard work but
can you please update "CHANGE LOG" ? because it is really hard to understand what changes or updates u made to the program..
Thanks again
can you please update "CHANGE LOG" ? because it is really hard to understand what changes or updates u made to the program..
Thanks again
Re: Rebuild "Jump if double event" from 0.4.0.r1397
Thanks for posting that. It was a good educated guess on your part 
My green friends expostulate me to resort Custom Writing Service secretly, because especially I have formidable problems with my professional study. They retrieve if I order this exceptional guide, it will facilitation me change my marks directly.
Re: Rebuild "Jump if double event" from 0.4.0.r1397
Hi Pako, thank you very much for the new version of EG! It works very good till now
Has the 0.4.x version now replaced the 0.3.x? Or is it a parallel developed version?
And -as altainta stated- it would be nice to update the change log.
Has the 0.4.x version now replaced the 0.3.x? Or is it a parallel developed version?
And -as altainta stated- it would be nice to update the change log.
- Pako
- Plugin Developer
- Posts: 2294
- Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 1:31 pm
- Location: Czech Republic
- Contact:
Re: Rebuild "Jump if double event" from 0.4.0.r1397
My intention is just to continue only the development of 0.4.x.
It depends on whether we happen to not come a hidden problem that will not be able to overcome.
But we can expect not to be necessary, returning to the 0.3.x.
Regarding CHANGE LOG:
You probably know that even Bitmonster not do it often. And yet he had no problem with English.
I have a big problem. For example, to write this text takes me about half an hour.
You can not expect that I'll write it. I have no such obligation.
Who is interested can find the necessary information in the SVN repository.
And if anyone wants to help can write a change log and I can incorporate it into the next build.
Pako
It depends on whether we happen to not come a hidden problem that will not be able to overcome.
But we can expect not to be necessary, returning to the 0.3.x.
Regarding CHANGE LOG:
You probably know that even Bitmonster not do it often. And yet he had no problem with English.
I have a big problem. For example, to write this text takes me about half an hour.
You can not expect that I'll write it. I have no such obligation.
Who is interested can find the necessary information in the SVN repository.
And if anyone wants to help can write a change log and I can incorporate it into the next build.
Pako